EIPS SermonAudio.com
Menu Items
Start Page · Search
Rome In the News
Answers (Q&A)
Audio Sermons
Photo Gallery
Our Guestbook
Errors of Rome
Caustic Comments
History Lessons
Rome & Politics
Sword (Bible)
How To Witness
EIPS Lectures
Other Interest

Wednesday, September 20, 2017
Date Posted:

Rome’s Paganism
Women in C of E
Rome and Islam
Prudence or Paranoia?
Rwandan Genocide
Christians in Iraq
Last Pope No Saint
Consilium Emendenda
Women, Family Life
Attempt to Whitewash
The ‘Miracle’
Origins of the Tablet
Rome Ruined Education
Rome's Education War
Who The Next Pope?
Rome Robbed Ireland
A Soul for Europe
The Vatican's Silence
Folk Superstition
Rome + Ireland
Vatican + Emancipation
O’Connell and Crown
Blair Signs It Away
Romanising of Ireland
Anglican 'gay' schism
Enslavement of Nation
Pope John Paul II
Anglicans Capitulate
Lose Heritage Forever?
Bishops Rome Burned
Were Reformers Right?
Call Him Antichrist
The Face of Rome
Popish Plot Exposed
Ignore Warning Signals
The Unofficial Visit
Rome’s Slander Refuted
Walsingham Idolatry
Days of Deliverance 14
Dr. Paisley's Speech
Days of Deliverance 13
Days of Deliverance 12
DUP Conference Speech
Days of Deliverance 11
Our Samaria
Genocide of Tutsis
E.U. Referendum
London Marathon
Days of Deliverance 10
Irish Confederation
Romes Plotting Exposed
Days of Deliverance 7
Days of Deliverance 6
Cardinal Faces Court
Days of Deliverance 5
Days of Deliverance 4
Days of Deliverance 1
Master of Hundred Arts
Teresa Beatified Info
New Cardinals Named
Swiss Guard Murders 3
Swiss Guard Murders 2
Compromise Theology
The Mysterious Death
Priest Is Dispensed! 3
Priest Is Dispensed! 2
Priest Is Dispensed! 1
An Opportunity
Holy Inquisition Today
Religion of Relics
Ecumenism And Rome
Sir Thomas More
Appeal to the Laity
Williamite Revolution
Romanism Face Lift
Dr. Paisley's Speech
Flogging a Dead Horse
John Paul Marches Rome
Churches and the EU
Inquisitor Ratzinger
Young People Today
Inquisition Alive Well
Dr Paisley Challenges
Next Conclave Looms
The Next Pope?
Rome, Russian Orthodox
Life is Beautiful? II
Woman Rides the Beast
President Putin
The Russian Orthodox
Mrs. Hanssen's Story
Hitler’s Pope Pius XII
BBC Infiltrated by RC
St. Faustina and EU?
Spectre of Opus Dei
The US Priest Scandal
N.I. Executive Fallen!
Cardinal: Murder Trial
Pope names new bishop
Ratzinger Rules Team
Jesuit Blames Bishops
Gays in the Seminary
700-Year Village Ban
Anti-Catholic Film
Icon Of Our Lady
Flirting With Popery
That Man of Sin
Mary Part of Godhead?
Carey Says Farewell
Gerry Adams and Pope
News: Admitting Lies
Catholic Scandals
Bleeding Statues
Chapter + Protectorate
The Hidden Years - 2
The Hidden Years
The Act of Settlement
England Catholicism 3
England Catholicism 2
England Catholicism 1
Rome’s Crusade
What Shall The End BE?
Naïve and Nefarious
Paradise Fauled
Choi Carp or Cavil
Biscuit Or The Mickey
English are Fatherless
Pope Asks Dead…
Aids Cure Pope Claims
Cardinal Double Speak
Bones of Contention
It's A Sex Mad World
Card-Carrying Masses
Rwandan Nuns Convicted
Blair Tells Paisley
All Hail Mary
Purgatory All
Wrong Without Shame
Paedophile Priests
Pope and 'Hellenics'
Road to Damascus
Wholly Rotten Bones
Patron Saint of Web?
Gore's Coup d'état
Buckfast Abbey
Pope Holds To The Lie
Pope's Patience Peters
Internet Intercession?
Dance With the Devil
Set To Die For Faith
Anglicans Help RC
Without Portfolio
Knights of the Vatican
Kilo Kicks the Pound
Promote Paedophiles?
Single Eyed Virgin!
Kennedy’s Tune
‘Grubby’ Royal Act
Dr. Paisley Statement
The Age Of Consent
Sins of the Fathers
R.C. Chaplain Cover-Up
Indecent Acts
Paedophile Priests
Pope’s Forked Tongue
Further Blow To Popery
Scarcity of Priests
Rome Beefs Up Politics
Ex-Convent Girl Screen
Forsake the Mass
Top Priority Wrong
'Must Say Sorry'
Outrage With Hospital
Birmingham Brothel
Rome and the Bible
New Vatican Ambassador
Sex Change Vicar
Who's Next In Rome?
Former Pope’s Plans
Catholics Become Kings
MPs Vote For Catholic
Pope Rebukes Cardinal
Paedophile Priest
Sir Thomas More
The Curse of Apathy
Popery Not a Religion
Popery's Impious Head
Queen's Apology: Pope
The WCC Sheds Its Skin
Global Christian Forum
Infall. Sectarianism
Ecumenical Farce!
Papal Lie vs. Truth
Christ or the Pope?
Paedophile Priests
Blair-faced Liars
Book: Battle for God
Antichrist Footsteps
Purification of Memory
The "Antichrist" Buck
Church of Ireland
Pope's "Apology"
Blair and Clinton
Blair, Haider, Hitler
"Holy" Nun
Bible and Romanism
Massing and Wining
Aitken and Rome
Satan's Hold
Romanist Attack
Rip in Curtain
Fires of Hell
Gates of Heaven

The Bible and Romanism – the window-dressing continues

Can a Church which has banned, burned and perverted the Bible now have been converted to recommending the reading of it?
Professor Arthur Noble

The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Dublin, Desmond Connell, has likened the Bible to a best-selling travel guide and urged young people to make use of it. In The Universe of December 26, 1999, he says: "I invite you over the coming year to open the Bible and to discover the good news it contains. […] I say to you, know the Gospel."

Has Rome suddenly changed? Can a Church which has banned, burned and perverted the Bible now have been converted to recommending the reading of it?

Do not be deceived. Here we have another sample of the window-dressing of contemporary Romanism. Most people are aware that Rome is presently carrying on a very extensive propaganda campaign. As the world enters the twenty-first century, popery is frantically engaged in posing as the promoter of Biblical Christianity and the preacher of the Gospel message in a Trojan-horse attempt to undo the work of the Reformation and regain the power and influence that she lost in the sixteenth century.

Nothing has changed. While Roman Catholicism appropriates the Christian name, it is essentially opposed to everything Christian. While it professes belief in the Bible, it prostitutes it to its own interpretation. Note in this context Connell's carefully added statement: "Know the Gospel by seeking help from wise guides" – meaning, of course, from a Church which claims the right to be the sole interpreter of the Scriptures. No, Rome has not changed: the Babylonian Whore is still naked despite her pretended facelift for the new millennium.

She continues to pay homage to the ordinances of Christianity, but, semper eadem, still perverts them to a purpose the reverse of their significance. She professes human dependence on divine grace, but then continues to sell salvation at a price. She has not ceased to subordinate the authority of the Word of God to the authority of her pagan traditions. She still arrogates to herself the right to be the supreme arbiter of human existence and destiny of the individual, the family and the nation. She has not abandoned her claim that the Pope is the head of all peoples, nor ceased to condemn all who refuse submission to her sole authority. She still enthrones the Pope as sovereign over all and exalts him above all that is called God, or is worshipped.

Rome is seeing and seizing her opportunity in this year 2000, and her profession of orthodoxy as to the fundamentals of the Bible is providing a very tempting bait for many. As ever, she is parasitical in both nature and habits, conveniently fastening herself like a leech upon the Bible and pretending to abjure heterodoxy. In reality, however, this window-dressing is an attempt to conceal the fact that most of the fundamental truths of the Gospel are absolutely negatived by what the Church of Rome really teaches, for she maintains that tradition is of equal value to the Bible and that salvation is impossible outside her own bosom.

In a word, Rome hates the light of the Bible. All past history fully testifies to this fact. Gregory IX forbade its possession and translation. When Wycliffe translated it, those who dared to read it were burned at the stake with copies of it about their necks [cf. Blackford Condit: The History of the English Bible, New York, 1881, p. 75].

It is scarcely remembered today, and conveniently overlooked by Connell, that in 1571 Queen Elizabeth sent a fount of Irish types and a printing-press to Ireland for the purpose of printing the Scriptures in Irish. These gifts were never used for that purpose and were ultimately secured by the Jesuits who carried them to Douay in France and deprived the Irish of the means of obtaining the Scriptures.

Let it be remembered that in 1816 Pius VII issued his Bull against Bible Societies, calling the circulation of the Scriptures "a crafty device by which the very foundations of religion are undermined, a pestilence which must be remedied and abolished, a defilement of the faith, eminently dangerous to souls, impious machinations of innovators, wickedness of a nefarious scheme, snares prepared for man's everlasting ruin, a new species of tares which an adversary has abundantly sown". This Bull also declares that "agreeably to the Index [i.e. the Council of Trent's Index of Prohibited Books, rule IV] the Bible printed by heretics is to be numbered among prohibited books" […].

Today the Church of Rome is repeating the principle of that fourth rule of the Council of Trent, which ordered: "If any one without a licence presume to read or keep by him the Bible, he shall be disqualified to receive the absolution of his sins till he deliver it up to the ordinary." This amounts in actual fact to saying that salvation can not be obtained by reading the Bible! The Bible, on the other hand, says: "Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life […]." (John 5:39) Like Archbishop Connell's remarks, guidance by the Roman Church in how to interpret the Bible does not look like a serious encouragement of the uncontrolled circulation of the Scriptures. If it were, Rome would have changed, and her profession of 'infallibility' would quickly be overturned.

After almost a thousand years of Bible prohibition, is it not a bit late for the Archbishop to be 'promoting' the Bible? Is Rome's new pretended promotion of the Bible not in itself an admission that the Bible was ever absent from her unbiblical system of worship? Is it not also indicative of the fact that, in order to appear to be a Christian Church and lure her victims into her fold, she must 'ape' true Christianity by pretending to ascribe to Biblical principles? Is it not a contradiction in terms that last December the Archbishop distributed a copy of St. Mark's Gospel to each person attending the blasphemous mass, when the sole, perfect and sufficient sacrifice of Christ exposes the very ritual of the mass as a blasphemy? Does Rome not condemn herself by refusing to distribute the Bible in its entirety and to allow her flock to read it independently of her influence?

Rome cannot allow unlimited circulation of the Scriptures or unsupervised 'interpretation' of them. Cardinal Wiseman, in his Catholic Doctrine of the Bible [London, 1853, p. 20], wrote: "If therefore we be asked why we do not give the Bible indifferently to all, and the shutting up of God's word be disdainfully thrown in our face, we will not seek to elude the question, or meet the taunts by denial, or by attempts to prove that our principles on the subject are not antagonistic to Protestants. They are antagonistic, and we glory in avowing it." [Emphasis mine.]

No wonder Rome hates the Bible, for no one who reads it can find in it one solitary word about the fallacies of Roman rites and ritual, from transubstantiation to auricular confession, from purgatory to the worshipping of images.

To our dear lost Roman Catholic fellow human beings we would say: Read the Bible in its entirety without the adulterated 'guidance' of your Church, go to your priest, and tell him that you cannot find your Church's doctrines in the Word of God. You will discover Rome's real attitude to the Bible, for your priest will argue with you and endeavour to convince you that you should shut up the Book that is 'leading you astray'. Then take Archbishop Connell to task.

You will jump for joy and praise God for giving us such a Book as the Bible. You will learn: "The entrance of thy words giveth light […]." (Psalm 119:130).

Back to Top

Email: eips_info@yahoo.co.uk
Return to EIPS Main Menu

Menu Items
- Start Page · Search - Rome In the News - Answers (Q&A) - Audio Sermons - Photo Gallery - Our Guestbook 
- Errors of Rome - Caustic Comments - History Lessons - Rome & Politics - Contemporary - Sword (Bible) 
- How To Witness - EIPS Lectures 
Site best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0 in 800x600 resolution.
© 1999 Ian Paisley. All rights reserved.