John Paul II as the Head of the Roman
Catholic Church believes and upholds the whole system of Roman dogmas; the
decrees and teachings of the so-called infallible popes who went before him.
1.
POPE JOHN PAUL BELIEVES THAT THERE IS NO
ONE ON EARTH GREATER THAN HIMSELF
Cardinal Manning, speaking for the Pope:
“In Christ’s right I am a sovereign. I acknowledge no civil superior; I am
the subject of no Prince, and I claim more than this – I claim to be the
supreme judge on earth, the director of the consciences of men; of the peasant
that tills the field and the Prince that sits on the throne; of the household
that sits in the shade of privacy and the legislature that makes laws for the
Kingdom. I am the last sole supreme judge on earth of what is right and
wrong.”
Or hear Pope Pius IX speak for himself:
“. Alone I am the successor of the apostles, the Vicar of Jesus Christ; I am
the Way, the Truth, and the Life.”
II.
POPE JOHN PAUL II BELIEVES THAT THE
ORDINATIONS OF THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY, DR RUNCIE, AND ALL THE ANGLICAN BISHOPS AND CLERGY OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND ARE UTTERLY INVALID AND
ALTOGETHER VOID.
Pope Leo XIII on Anglican Orders
From the epistle Apostolicae curae, 13 September 1896. Acta Sanctae Sedis (96/97),
198 sqq. Extract in Denzinger, 1963 sqq: “And so we pronounce and declare that
ordinations performed according to the Anglican rite are utterly invalid and
altogether void.”
Recently Cardinal Hume maintained, in a
widely published article, that he wholeheartedly accepted the teaching of his
church and that the Archbishop’s and his clergy’s ordinations were utterly
invalid and altogether void.
III.
POPE JOHN PAUL II BELIEVES THAT NO ONE
CAN BE SAVED WHO DOES NOT SUBMIT TO HIM.
The Bull ‘Unam Sanctam,’ 1302
Corpus luris Canonicl (Friedberg), II,
1245. Mirbt, No. 372
“We are obliged by the faith to believe
and hold – and we do firmly believe and sincerely confess – that there is one
Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, and that outside this Church there is
neither salvation nor remission of sins … Furthermore we declare, state,
define and pronounce that it is altogether necessary to salvation for every
human creature to be subject to the Roman pontiff.”
IV.
POPE JOHN PAUL II BELIEVES THAT HE IS THE
RIGHTFUL OWNER OF THE REALM OF ENGLAND AND THAT ENGLAND OWES ROME MANY MILLIONS OF POUNDS.
Pope Innocent III forced King John to
hand over his Kingdom and to receive it back again only as a feudal dependent
of the Pope on the basis of large payments. Rome still claims that this agreement stands and successive popes have
refused to repudiate it and give up its claims. Moreover from time to time
history records the attempts of Rome to demand what it has called its just payments.
John’s Concession of the Kingdom to the Pope
“We offer and freely grant to God and His
holy apostles Peter and Paul, and the holy Roman Church, our mother, and to our
lord the Pope Innocent and his catholic successors, the whole realm of England
and the whole realm of Ireland with all their rights and appurtenances, for the
remission of our sins and those of all our race, as well quick as dead; and
from now receiving back and holding these, as a feudal dependent, from God and
the Roman Church, in the presence of the prudent man Pandulf, subdeacon and one
of the household of the lord the pope, do and swear fealty for them to the
aforesaid our lord the Pope Innocent and his catholic successors and the Roman
Church … the Church receive 1000 marks sterling each year, to wit for the realm
of England, and 300 for the realm of Ireland’ saving to us and our heirs, our
rights, liberties, and royalties. All which, as aforesaid, we willing them to
be ratified and confirmed in perpetuity bind ourselves and our successors not
to contravene. And if we or any of our successors shall presume to attempt
this, whoever he be, unless he come to his senses after due admonition, let him
forfeit right to the kingdom, and let this charter of obligation and concession
on our part remain in force forever.”
V.
POPE JOHN PAUL II BELIEVES THAT HER
MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II IS A USURPER ON THE THRONE AS THE DESCENDANT OF
QUEEN ELIZABETH 1 WHOM ONE OF HIS PREDECESSORS EXCOMMUNICATED AND DAMNED.
Blasphemous Bull of Damnation and Excommunication by
Pope Pius V against Queen Elizabeth, May 3rd 1570
ENGLISH
ROMAN CATHOLICS INCITED TO REBELLION
“We do out of the fullness of our
Apostolic power declare the aforesaid ELIZABETH, being a Heretic, and a
favourer of Heretics, and her adherents in the matters aforesaid, to have
incurred the sentence of anathema, and to be cut off from the unity of the
Body of Christ. And moreover we do declare her to be deprived of her pretended
title to the kingdom aforesaid, and of all dominion, dignity, and privilege
whatsoever …. And we do command and interdict all and every the noblemen,
subjects, people, and others aforesaid, that they presume not to obey her to
her monitions, mandates, and laws; and those who shall do the contrary, we do
strike with the like sentence of Damnation.”
Pope Gregory XIII Sanctions the Assassination of Queen Elizabeth, Dec 12th, 1580
“Since that guilty woman of England rules
over two such noble Kingdoms of Christendom, and is the cause of so much injury
to the catholic faith, and loss of so many million souls, there is no doubt
that whosoever sends her out of the world with the pious intention of doing God
service, not only does not sin but gains merit, especially having regard to the
sentence pronounced against her by Pius V of holy memory. And so, if those
English nobles decide actually to undertake so glorious a work, your Lordship
can assure them that they do not commit any sin. We trust in God also that
they will escape danger. As far as concerns your Lordship, in case you have
incurred any irregularity, the Pope bestows on you his holy benediction.”
POSTSCRIPT
The following question was tabled by Dr Ian Paisley MP
to the Prime Minister in the House of Commons on 16/2/82. It was refused.
Is Her Majesty’s Government aware that there is a
large body of opinion amongst practising Christians, even amongst clergy of the
Church of England that the intention of Her Majesty to receive the Pope of Rome
during his proposed visit is ill advised, and is not in keeping with her Accession
Declaration and Coronation Oath and her position as Civil Head under Christ of
the Established Church?
