Menu Items
Start Page · Search
Rome In the News
Answers (Q&A)
Audio Sermons
Photo Gallery
Our Guestbook
Errors of Rome
Feature Articles
Union With Rome
Second Coming
Pope: Antichrist
Priesthood: Christ
Caustic Comments
History Lessons
Rome & Politics
Sword (Bible)
How To Witness
EIPS Lectures
Other Interest

Wednesday, September 20, 2017
Date Posted:

New Book: Where Rome Is Wrong

New Book: Where Rome Is Wrong (Part Three)

An Exposure of Rome’s Authoritarianism, Totalitarianism and Sectarianism
Dr. Ian R. K. Paisley

What is the great divide between Bible Protestantism and Roman Catholicism?  It is the office and nature of the Priest.

In this issue Bible Protestantism goes one way and Roman Catholicism goes the opposite way.  There is on this vital subject the fork in the road.  Between the Anglican and the Free Churchman the contention is also the priest.

The struggle is on the one hand the priest and on the other the family.  To Rome, marriage and the family are inferior.  The priest represents celibacy, confession and the sharing of the secrets of marriage love to a third person.

Roman Catholicism exalts the priesthood.  It raises the priest to the standing of God and gives to Him the power to create God in the Mass.

Roman Catholicism is priestism.  It is reversal and that means degeneration.

The whole idea of the Roman priesthood is one of development.  The Roman priesthood grew on to the church.  It had a false start, which led on to greater and greater apostasy.

The Roman Priesthood is not in the New Testament.  It has no place whatever there.

The New Testament knows everything about the priesthood of all believers.   The true and spiritual office of the whole church is a nation of priests.  Neither the name nor the position of the Roman Priest has a place anywhere in the New Testament.

The Church has but One Priest and that is our Lord Jesus Christ.  Christ has only one spouse one bride and one wife.  There are no sacrificing priests in the New Testament but One Great High Priest, Jesus the Son God.

The early Church held to this truth.  Augustine asserted, ‘All are priests as members of the One Priest’.

It was Tertullian, about 200 AD who says, ‘Where there are three there the church is, if they be but laymen’.

The Roman priesthood turned the early Church like a tide.  It was the intrusion into the Church of the priesthood of paganism.

It was Cyprian, Bishop of Carthage who pushed the universal priesthood of all believers aside and fastened upon the church the so-claimed magical priesthood of Rome.

The evolution of the pagan priesthood in the Papist Church grew apace. 

No better course could be adopted in order to discover the real nature of Rome’s Antichristianity than to examine a text book which is a ‘must’ for her priests in preparation for their priesthood.

Such a textbook is ‘Dignity and Duties of the Priest or Selva’. (A collection of Materials for Ecclesiastical Retreats. Rule of Life and Spiritual Rules) by St. Alphonsus de Liguori.

Just how high Alphonsus is reckoned in the scale of precedence of Roman saints can be seen from the 'Notice' which appears in the preface to the volume. It concludes with this eulogy ‘LIVE JESUS, MARY, JOSEPH AND ALPHONSUS!’


“Jesus has died to institute the priesthood. It was not necessary for the Redeemer to die in order to save the world; a drop of his blood, a single tear, or prayer, was sufficient to procure salvation for all; for such a prayer, being of infinite value, should be sufficient to save not one but a thousand worlds.  But to Institute the priesthood, the death of Jesus Christ has been necessary.  Had he not died, where should we find the victim that the priests of the New Law now offer? a victim altogether holy and immaculate, capable of giving to God an honour worthy of God.  As had been already said, all the lives of men and angels are not capable of giving to God an infinite honour like that which a priest offers to him by a Single Mass.”

The above statement is a hideous blasphemy. ‘Christ died for the ungodly.’

‘God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets’.

‘Hath in these last days spoken unto us by His Son, whom He hath appointed heir of all things by whom also He made the worlds.  Who being the brightness of His glory, and the express image of His person, and upholding all things by the word of His power, when He had by Himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high.’

‘But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God.’  The purpose of the Blood‑shedding on the Cross was not to institute the massing priesthood of Rome but to purchase the redemption of the people of God.

Any system which holds such an unscriptural view of the Work of the Cross as Rome does is plainly not a Christian system at all but is part of the system of Satan and Antichrist.


“Were the Redeemer to descend into a church, and sit in a confessional to administer the sacrament of penance, and a priest to sit in another confessional, Jesus would say over each penitent, ‘Ego te absolvo,’ the priest would likewise say over each of his penitents, ‘Ego te absolvo,’ and the penitents of each would equally be absolved.”


“Thus the priest may, in a certain manner, be called the creator of his Creator, since by saying the words of the consecration, he creates, as it were, Jesus in the sacrament, by giving him a sacramental existence, and produces him as a victim to be offered to the eternal Father. As in creating the world it was sufficient for God to have said, Let it be made, and it was created.  He spoke, and they were made, so it is sufficient for the priest to say, ‘Hoc est cnim corpus meum,’ and behold the bread is no longer bread, but the body of Jesus Christ.  ‘The power of the priest,’ says St Bernardine of Sienna, ‘is the power of the divine person; for the transubstantiation of the bread requires as much power as the creation of the world’.”

“With regard to the mystical body of Christ, that is, all the faithful, the priest has the power of the keys, or the power of delivering sinners from hell, of making them worthy of paradise, and of changing them from the slaves of Satan into the children of God.  And God himself is obliged to abide by the judgment of his priests, and either not to pardon or to pardon, according as they refuse or give absolution, provided the penitent is capable of it.”

The practice of the Roman priesthood submerged the universal priesthood of all believers and the only real and active assertion of the believer is priesthood in the world today is in Biblical Protestantism.

The Reformation purged out the pagan priesthood and banished the title “priest” as the name of the Christian minister of the Word of God.

Well may we ask, what is the real nature of the universial priesthood of all believers?  We as Bible believing Protestants do not reject the priesthood. That is something which is inherent to the entire church of all believers.  We are a nation of priests – a royal priesthood.

The Church, the whole church, is a priesthood.  The Church has not got a priesthood but is a priesthood.

While acknowledging the priesthood of all believers Rome goes on to virtually destroy the New Testament priesthood and to elevate its conceptions of its own pagan priesthood.

The Council of Trent is specific and plain, I quote:-

‘The outward priesthood belongs not to all the faithful, but only to certain men, who are instituted and consecrated by the imposition of hands and the due rites of the Church to a specially sacred ministry.  And the power of this outward priesthood is the power of offering to God the great sacrifice of the Church for the living and the dead – the Mass.’

While acknowledging the priesthood of all believers Trent exalts far above it her own unscriptural pagan priestly cult and what is more, empties the universal priesthood of all belief as the result of the pretended magic of baptismal regeneration.

Trent teaches plainly that the priesthood of all believers is not theirs by virtue of their faith but in virtue of their baptism, so that the inward priesthood is wholly dependent on the pagan priests of Mother Church.

Moreover it is not necessary, for the power of the outward priesthood should have the grace of the inward.  The outward priest has all the power of the priest no matter how filthy he may be in his everyday living, because his priesthood rests not in his personal faith and holiness but on his appointment.

He does not need to be the truly regenerated man, he only requires to be the Church created priest.

Power and sanctity are not joined.  They may be entirely divorced but the man is still a priest because his priesthood is not attainment but appointment.

The Roman priest may be as filthy as sin but that does in no way hold against the validity of his priestly powers.  He can live in sin but his powers are unchallenged and unchallengable.

Roman Catholicism makes the assent of the Church an instutution instead of the Gospel.  It believes in a church rite rather in Christ’s faith.

‘The two priesthoods have, in fact, nothing in common except the name.  They are not an essential and spiritual connection.  The cleric is above the Church; he becomes the Church; he is described as a God.  He draws his official power directly from God.  His is the sole medium of grace for believers, who become and remain such only through the sacraments in his hands.  And yet he need not be a personally holy man.’

Bible Protestantism is in clear antagonism to Roman pagan sin- practising priests.

The individual believers have no mediaterial place, Christ is the only mediator between God and man.

Luther declared a simple truth when he said:-

‘We take our stand on this.  There is no other Word of God than that whose publication is enjoined on all Christians’

The temper of the hour in which we live is to a large extent pagan priestliness.  It longs for the material, that which is seen in its worship.  It has rejected the teaching of Christ.  ‘He that worships Him (the Father) must worhsip Him in spirit and in truth’.  No wonder the Reformers rejected the worshp of Rome.  The penitents in the worship of  today dress up.  The penitents in the Bible rent their clothes.

We hear a lot about cultured Protestantism today.  Cultured Protestantism is Protestantism without the Gospel!

There are those today who are more content to be in a cultured Church than in a true Church.  They respond to the amenities of a cultured society better than to the vigour of the Christian faith.

‘The real roots of the Roman reaction lie in the unrealised Romanism of Protestants. And the Protestant root of a mass priesthood is the idea so dear to the English mind, so central to a rational broad Churchism in every Church, and so plausible as the ethical movement – the idea that the best action or conduct is contributory to salvation instead of  produced by it.  This is the Pelagian and Synergistic (man helping God to save himself), faith of medieval Catholicism reappearing in the circles of humanist Protestantism.  Nothing is in more distinct contrast with the Protestant doctrine of justification by faith alone, nor in contrast more fatal.  To adopt it is in principle to renounce the Reformation, whether it be done on agnostic or on Catholic lines.  The Reformation had to break away for its life both from the Catholics and from the humanists.  These, as I have said, took up Luther, but he outgrew them’.

‘It was not mere sacramental works that the Reformers denied to have saving value, but ethical no less.  It was not the mere ritual of worship that Paul fought when he led Luther’s way, but that of conduct as well.  Man can contribute nothing to his own salvation.  “Work out your own salvation, for it is God that worketh in you.”  Yes, but God the Redeemer.  What works in you is the redemption which you have already apprehended by faith alone.  The words were spoken not to the natural conscience but to the redeemed.  Any form of Synergism (man’s ability to help God in saving him) is fatal to justification by grace alone, which is the base of the true Protestant priesthood of all believers’.

Christianity is a religion and a faith before it is an ethic.  It is ethical because of its faith in the supreme and all-inclusive ethical act of God in the Redeemer.’

There is much we must learn and there is much we must forget.

To be taught of God is to unlearn much and to grow in grace and in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.

What must I do to be saved?

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved. Acts 16:31.

Back to Top

Email: eips_info@yahoo.co.uk
Return to EIPS Main Menu

Menu Items
- Start Page · Search - Rome In the News - Answers (Q&A) - Audio Sermons - Photo Gallery - Our Guestbook 
- Errors of Rome - Feature Articles - Union With Rome - Second Coming - Falsehoods - Pope: Antichrist 
- Priesthood: Christ - Caustic Comments - History Lessons - Rome & Politics - Contemporary - Sword (Bible) 
- How To Witness - EIPS Lectures 
Site best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0 in 800x600 resolution.
© 1999 Ian Paisley. All rights reserved.