| Date Posted: 1/21/1999 | | |
Contents
|
Romanism, Mary and the Holy Spirit Lecture at a Seminar of the European Institute of Protestant Studies Professor Arthur Noble
Introduction The previous two lectures at today's seminar have dealt with
the Mariolatry of Romanism in relation to God the Father and God the Son
respectively. My task is to examine the subject "Romanism, Mary and the
Holy Spirit". This is an extremely difficult undertaking, not least because
it has never been systematically attempted before; but with the Bible as my
infallible guide to eternal truth I have the means of exposing yet another
blatant falsehood of the Roman Church. It is impossible, in the forty minutes at my disposal, to
present a complete analysis of the Biblical doctrine of the Holy Spirit and the
way in which Romanism corrupts it, especially through infiltrating it with
Mariolatry; but at least there are certain key aspects which can be
allowed to determine the structure of our investigation. 1. The Mary of the Bible and the Mary of Romanism Before coming to our subject proper I want to emphasise that
there is not the remotest relationship between the Mary of the Bible and the
Mary of the Roman Church. The Bible records nothing at all about the birth of
Mary, says very little about her life, and provides no comment whatever about
her death. She is not mentioned throughout all the Acts of the Apostles, except
in one solitary instance (Acts 1:14) where the disciples were assembled together
and we are told that they gave themselves all with one accord to prayer and
supplication with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus and with His brethren.
Now is it not remarkable that this, the last view that God gives us of the
mother of Jesus, is not of her as the object of the disciples' prayers,
adoration or worship, as is the case in Romanism, but as a woman in supplication
herself - as one of a group of sinners who felt their need for the Holy
Spirit and continued praying earnestly for ten days until the Spirit descended
on the day of Pentecost and - we read in Acts 2:4 - all of
them "were filled with the Holy Ghost"! After this, Mary is not again
mentioned in the Holy Scriptures. How different from the Mary of Romanism with her supposed
eternal virginity, her sinless life, her assumption and all her other divine
attributes! The Church of Rome has not been wanting in supplying the supposed
deficiency. Papal authors, ignoring the revealed Word of God, have first
imagined, and then believed, and then written vast volumes about the birth and
the life and the death of Mary - and long before her birth and long after
her death. They tell us that she was present at the Creation, and they say that
she will welcome the redeemed into Heaven, where the doctrine of the Assumption
(proclaimed in 1950 by Pius XII) tells us she herself already is. They have had
supernatural visions and wondrous revelations, and have progressively
transformed her into a fiction which bears no resemblance to the actual Mary of
the Bible. They have made a "perpetual virgin" [Catechism of the
Catholic Church, §499] of a real woman who was not only Christ's and
his brethren's mother, but also Joseph's loving wife. They have turned into the
"Queen of the Universe" a fragile human being about whose welfare the
dying Jesus on the Cross was so concerned that he entrusted her to the care of
John. You can read all about this idealised and idolised Mary in
Liguori's book The Glories of Mary, which was published at the end of the
18th century, a later edition appearing in 1931. This Cardinal
Alphonsus de Liguori - who, incidentally, declared that lying and
prostitution were acceptable in certain circumstances - was highly praised
by the Church of Rome, and in 1803 the Congregation of Rites decreed that
"in all the writings of Alphonsus de Liguori there is not one word that can
justly be faulted". Thus the Vatican formally pronounced all of his
teaching to be that of the Church of Rome. Later he was elevated to become a
"Saint"! I read with great interest a pamphlet by Dr. Paisley which
more accurately describes this man as "Liguori the Filthy". This book The Glories of Mary is a virtual summary of
how the so-called great "saints" of the Roman Church have distorted
the Biblical Mary. The chapter headings are staggering, ascribing to Mary
titles, abilities and functions which belong to God alone: "Mary, our Life,
our Sweetness", "our Hope", "our Help", "our
Guardian", "our Salvation", "Mother of Mercy",
"Queen of Heaven" - every one of them a fantasy invented by
Rome; every one of them a usurpation of the attributes of one or more Persons of
the Holy Trinity. Martin Luther had already written much against such elevation
of Mary to divine status. In The Works of Luther, Vol. 22, we read:
"[...] since His mother, Mary, the virgin, was known to be a plain
carpenter's wife, no more respect was shown to her than to any ordinary woman.
[...] For the greater the men of God and the larger the measure of the
Spirit in them, the greater the diligence and attention they devote to the Son
rather than to the mother." 2. The Revealed Biblical Doctrine of the Trinity Before we can understand Rome's teaching on the relationship
between Mary and the Holy Spirit, a brief commentary on the nature of the
Trinity is necessary. The trinity of persons in one Divine essence is a revealed
doctrine. It is not the product of human thinking, and yet it is revealed in the
Bible to human reason. It is above and beyond reason, but not contrary to
reason. One does not have to abandon one's reasoning powers to grasp it. In I
Thes. 5:21 we are exhorted: "Prove all things." The unity of God is clearly taught in the Bible. Deut.
6:4 - "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord." Isa. 44:6
- "I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no
God." The Unitarians have no monopoly on the doctrine of one God. The Scriptures also teach that the one and only God, whose Name
is Jehovah, exists in three persons - in a threefold
relationship as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. God is called Father, and
if there is a Father there must be a Son. Note however that in the Biblical
context of the Trinity, 'Father' and 'Son' are terms to denote
relationship rather than time, for God is eternal. In human
relationships time is involved, for the father must be older than the son; but
since God the Father is eternal, the Son is also eternal. In John 17:5 the Son
speaks of the glory which He had with the Father "before the world
began". Moreover, the Lord Jesus Christ is expressly called God in the
Bible. Speaking of Him in I Tim. 3:16 Paul says: "Great is the mystery of
godliness: God was manifest in the flesh." In John 10:30 Jesus Himself
says: "I and the Father are one." By the same token, the Holy Spirit is plainly declared to be
the eternal God. The Bible says that at creation "the Spirit of God moved
upon the waters" (Gen. 1:2). Christ told His disciples that He would pray
the Father to send them another Comforter - another Paraclete -
another person of like kind - to be their helper after He would leave them
(John 14:16). Hence the Holy Spirit is a distinct person in the Godhead. When
Peter charges Ananias with lying to the Holy Ghost, he then says: "Thou
hast not lied unto men, but unto God." (Acts 5:3-4) Hence the Holy Spirit
is revealed as being God and being eternal. It is said that when Patrick went to preach to the pagans in
Ireland, he found great difficulty in making clear to them this truth about the
Trinity. When he was asked whether there were three Gods or one, he picked up a
shamrock and said: "As there are three in one and one in three in this
little plant, so is God." The Westminster Confession explains it as follows: "In the
unity of the Godhead there be three persons of one substance, power, and
eternity: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost. The Father is of
none, neither begotten nor proceeding; the Son is eternally begotten of the
Father; the Holy Ghost eternally proceeding from the Father and the
Son." The American New Hampshire Confession states likewise: "We
believe that there is one and only one living and true God, an infinite,
intelligent Spirit, Whose Name is Jehovah, the Maker and Supreme Ruler of heaven
and earth; inexpressibly glorious in holiness and worthy of all possible honour,
confidence, and love; that in the unity of the Godhead there are three persons,
the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, equal in every divine perfection, and
executing distinct but harmonious offices in the great work of human
redemption." 3. Rome's Corrupted Doctrine of the Trinity Now you would hardly expect the Church of Rome to agree with
this pure and unadulterated definition of the Trinity as revealed in the Word of
God. After all, she has had a historical propensity for claiming the sole right
to interpret the Bible and to supplant and supplement it with her ecclesiastical
traditions. She has even gone so far as to pretend that the Bible is subservient
to her traditions. It is true that the Roman Church acknowledges the Trinity of
God. §260 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church [Pocket Edition,
Veritas, Dublin, 1995] mentions "the perfect unity of the Blessed
Trinity"; §260 states: "The mystery of the Most Holy Trinity is
the central mystery of the Christian faith [...]"; and in §266
Rome claims that she worships "one God in the Trinity and the Trinity in
unity, without either confusing the persons or dividing the substance
[...]". Yet let us look more closely at the reality behind this mask.
Increasingly, in her teachings and practice, Rome has placed the cult of Mary
above the worship of the Triune God; she has ascribed a far greater place to the
worship of the Virgin than to the Creator Himself; and she has undermined the
nature and function of the Trinity by attributing roles to Mary which usurp
those of all three Persons of the Godhead. As early as 1825, in a prayer published in Rome "with
licence of Superiors", Mary was placed on a level with God as an object of
worship. The prayer includes the following words: "I adore You, Eternal
Father; I adore You, Eternal Son; I adore You, most Holy Spirit; I adore you,
most Holy Virgin, Queen of the Heavens, Lady and Mistress of the Universe."
How could Mary be the Queen of Heaven? Scripture tells us that Christ is the
King, but never that there is a queen. If there were a queen who shared
Christ's throne it would be His bride, the Church composed of the redeemed. The
only "queen of heaven" mentioned in Scripture is to be found in Jer.
7:18 and 44:15. It is an idol which was worshipped by pagans. Jewish women gave
offerings to it and in so doing brought the wrath of God upon themselves.
"The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women
knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink
offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger." (Jer.
7:18) As a result of Rome's usurpation of the divine power of God
through the cult of the Virgin, which has been steadily promoted for centuries,
the Mother of our Lord occupies a position today, in the thought of the
adherents of Rome, as T.C. Hammond puts it, "hardly distinguishable from
that of a goddess" [The One Hundred Texts, London, 1966, flyleaf].
Hammond's assertion that the cult of Mary "has almost reached its
climax" is opportune, since it has been predicted by some that the Roman
Church, which for centuries has already worshipped Mary as if she were
God, will soon officially declare her co-equal to the Father, Son and
Holy Spirit. In this way Rome will soon have virtually transformed the Biblical
doctrine of the Trinity into a doctrine of a sort of Quaternity by which Mary
will be officially decreed by the Pope to be an actual fourth person of the
Godhead - omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent, as she already is in
practice. If like me you have been to Spain, Portugal and most of the
Roman Catholic countries of South and Central America, you have probably
experienced somewhere the religious ceremony of the Roman Church called the
"Coronation of the Virgin". On this occasion an image is decked with
velvet, gold and jewels, enthroned on an altar, solemnly crowned by priests, and
paraded through the streets. Hobart Seymour, the author of Rome, Pagan and
Papal, has very clearly shown the identity of this and other religious
ceremonies of modern Romanism with those of ancient Rome, which likewise
persecuted real Christians. He writes: "There is the dressing and decking
of it [the image of the Virgin]; burning incense to it; lighting candles to it;
bowing and kneeling before it; the utterance of prayer before it; the crowning
it - everything, in short, that could be done, if the special object was
the religious worship and adoration of the image itself; as if the ancient
heathens of Rome were again worshipping and adoring one of the ancient images of
their heathen goddesses." 4. Mariolatry's Usurpation of the Person of the Holy Spirit and
Surpassing of all three Persons of the Holy Trinity What is happening through this process of worshipping the image
of the Virgin is obvious: it is that the Mary of Romanism not only usurps
the Person of the Holy Spirit, but is also elevated above all three
Persons of the Holy Trinity. We have already been well instructed today in the manner in
which the Mary of Romanism has been cultivated to supplant both God the Father
and God the Son. To the illustrations given by Dr. Paisley I would merely add a
couple more preposterous claims from Rome herself. In The Glories of
Mary, God the Father as Creator of the universe, with his divine plan of
salvation, is ousted by Mary, and John 3:16 is rewritten as follows: "For
Mary so loved the world, that she gave her only begotten Son, that whoso
believeth in her should not perish, but have everlasting life." Yet Rome in
her arrogance does not tremble at this blasphemy. She goes even further. In her
New Catechism she gives Mary the attributes of co-redeemer, mediatrix and
advocate, despite the fact that Mary herself knew she was a sinner in need of a
Saviour (Luke 1:46-47). The key to the Romanist dogma of Mary's relationship to the
Trinity is a statement of Pope Pius XII in 1954: "Mary is indeed worthy to
receive honour and might and glory. She is exalted to hypostatic union with the
Blessed Trinity." This idea has since become more and more prevalent. The
Winter, 1994, Fatima Crusader declared: "Madonna has a share in the
royalty of God." She is quoted there as having said - as to where,
when and to whom, your guess is as good as mine: "I am she who is in the
Divine Trinity." Dave Hunt, in his brilliant book A Woman Rides the Beast:
The Roman Catholic Church and the Last Days [Harvest House, Minneapolis,
1994, p. 445], has found one of the most succinct official Romanist
pronouncements on Mary's relationship to the Holy Spirit. He quotes from Soul
Magazine, which describes itself as the "Official publication of The
Blue Army of Our Lady of Fatima in the U.S. and Canada" (22 million
strong). This magazine [Nov.-Dec., 1984, p. 4] declares: "Mary is so
perfectly united with the Holy Spirit that He acts only through [her] his Spouse
[...]. All our life, every thought, word, and deed is in her hands
[...]. At every moment, She herself must instruct, guide, and transform
each one of us into Herself, so that not we but She lives in us, as Jesus lives
in her, and the Father in the Son." Mary is here declared to be not only perfectly
"united" with the Holy Spirit (that is, made one and identical with
Him), but also to be the one and only mediatrix through which the Holy Spirit
acts. That means that Mary is God! Worse, it means that she is
superior to God in all His three Persons! Hence we should not be
surprised when we read in Liguori how Rome elevates Mary to such a degree that
"all things, even God, obey the commands of Mary" [Vol. 1, p.
265]. Have you every read such blasphemous rubbish? Nowhere does the
Bible say that the Holy Spirit acts only through Mary. The Holy Spirit has been
in action eternally: He was present at Creation. The Biblical Mary was a human
being, a temporal woman. She was not elevated to a divinity by the Holy Spirit;
on the contrary, it was she who 'magnified the Lord', for she was a sinner who
needed repentance, and who referred to her Son Jesus as "God my
Saviour" (Luke 1:47). Nowhere does the Bible say either that God obeys the
commands of Mary. John Wesley, in his Explanatory Notes on the New
Testament (John 2:2-5), writes: "May we not learn hence, if His mother
was rebuked for attempting to direct Him in the days of his flesh, how absurd it
is to address her as if she has a right to command Him in the throne of His
glory?" Is not this elevation of Mary above the Triune God Rome's
ultimate blasphemy against the Holy Spirit? All that is directly said about this
sin is found in Matt.12:31-32; Mark 3:28-30; and Luke 12:10. This is the sin
that has no forgiveness. All other sins are forgiven on the terms of repentance
and faith. The unpardonable sin is called blasphemy against the Spirit -
an intentional indignity or slander. It may be committed by speech, by writing,
or by sign; but how much greater must be the blasphemy of actually elevating a
human woman above the Holy Spirit and asserting that He obeys her commands! Do we need any further proof that Romanism is Marianism?
It is in her alone that Rome's poor duped souls put all their hope. Even the
Mass has been converted into Mary-worship by the addition of prayers to her and
the prominence given to them. 5. The Corruption and Perversion of the Functions and Fruits of
the Holy Spirit Now if the Church of Rome has corrupted the nature of
the Holy Spirit in this way, she must also have perverted the Holy Spirit's
functions and fruits. Time constrains me to a few examples of
each. (a) The functions of the Spirit
(b) The fruits of the Spirit Time restricts me to the first three fruits of the Spirit
mentioned in Galatians 5:22 - "[...] love, joy, peace
[...]". - Rome has turned these fruits respectively into hatred,
misery and war.
Rome's hatred of all who disagree with her was the
driving force behind the Inquisition; her hatred resulted in the
horrendous torture of the innocents and the bloody massacre of the Martyrs.
During the history of her existence she has been responsible for the death of
some 50,000,000 people - which makes the atrocities of Hitler and Phol Pot
look like a Sunday school picnic. - The same ethos of hatred lurks
today behind her mask of love for the 'heretics' whom she now addresses as her
'separated brethren', and that hatred would be practised again if she
ever succeeded in destroying the Protestantism that she loathes. At the College
of Maynooth today students still study the works of Bellarmine, a Jesuit
involved in the condemnation of Galileo and made a cardinal by Pope Clement VIII
in 1599. Bellarmine expressed his 'love' for his Protestant fellow-humans as
follows: "[...] heretics are undoubtedly to be extirpated: but
[...] if they are stronger than we are, [...] then we are to keep
quiet. [...] heretics when strong are to be committed to God; when weak to
the executioner." [Quoted in The Protestant Echo, Vol. XXIV, 1903,
p. 3.] While preaching ecumenical love to her "separated brethren" on
the one hand, on the other hand she calls modern Protestantism "the
religion of murderers" [The Catholic Herald, October 13, 1998].
The illustrious Irish scholar and minister Dr. Adam Clarke,
after visiting Maynooth College in 1811 - a full century and a half after
the Reformation and a half century after the Age of Enlightenment! - noted
that Romish Ireland was still the most primitive and backward country in
Europe: The Roman Catholic population of Ireland is, in general, in
very great misery; and this is chiefly occasioned not by any political
incapacities under which they labour, but through a bad creed, which prevents
the cultivation of their minds; for among Roman Catholics education is greatly
proscribed; and, therefore, they know nothing of the management of their own
minds, but become the tools of their priests, and thus, through their want of
knowledge, they are easily misled, and through the strength of their passions
they are readily employed in acts the most desperate, and schemes the most
preposterous. Having no education and no mental cultivation, they are
unacquainted with method, plan, and order; they do nothing by rule, consequently
nothing regularly, nothing in its time and place, but all is hurry and
confusion. They are dirty in their persons, clothes, houses, furniture, and even
in their food. [...] They have no economy; they are wretched, because they will
not endeavour to be otherwise; they destroy one-half of their property by
mismanagement and idleness. [...] Their religious holidays [...] retard useful
labour. [...] They are not really religious; they will invoke you by the Holy
Trinity, by Jesus, Joseph, Mary, and St. Patrick; but these have no moral
influence in their hearts or on their lives. [...] They have no idea of inward
holiness - outward observances constitute their religion, leaving all
other matters to be transacted for them by their priests with God. They are
taught to hold in hatred all other religionists, because they are told God hates
them. Hence they are cruel and bloodthirsty, [...] incendiaries, and often
murderers! What then, does Ireland owe to the Roman Catholic religion? It found
them uncultivated savages - and leaves them little better than fiends.
[...] Compare their state with the Protestant Irish, [...] who are, in every
respect, the reverse of their misguided countrymen. Has the situation changed much today, two and a half centuries
after the Reformation? In 1994, after a visit to this Island, Ken Samples wrote
in the Milwaukee Sentinel (Winter, 1994): "In recent years, the
Catholic Irish Republic (Eire) has benefitted much from [...] membership of
the European Union. Because of this, the contrast is not as noticeable as it was
twenty years ago, but it is still there. A trip from Belfast to Dublin will be
an eye-opener when one wants to gauge the influence of the Roman Catholic
Church."
The distinguished American writer Jeremiah J. Crowley, who quit
the Roman priesthood after twenty-one years, quotes the following statement in
his book Romanism, a Menace to the Nation [Aurora, 1910, p. 138f.]
made by the Hon. Andrew D. White, former American US Ambassador to Germany: The Pope and his advisers have never hesitated to urge on war,
no matter how bloody, when the slightest of their ordinary worldly purposes
could be served by it. The great religious wars of Europe were entirely stirred
up and egged on by them; and [...] the Pope did everything to prevent the
signing of the Treaty of Münster, which put an end to the dreadful Thirty
Years' War, even going so far as to declare the oaths taken by the
plenipotentiaries at that congress to no effect. All through the Middle Ages and
at the Renaissance period the Popes kept Italy in turmoil and bloodshed for
their own territorial advantages, and they kept all Europe in turmoil for two
centuries after the Reformation [...] in the wars of religion. They did
everything they could to stir up a war between Austria and Prussia in 1866,
thinking that Austria, a Catholic power, was sure to win; and then everything
possible to stir up the war of France against Prussia in 1870 in order to
accomplish the same purpose of checking German Protestantism; and now they are
doing all they can to arouse hatred, even to deluge Italy in blood, in the vain
attempt to recover the temporal power [...]. They pretend to be anxious to
'save souls', and especially to love Poland and Ireland; but they have for years
used those countries as mere pawns in their game [...].
If you want to test whether the Church of Rome is the
dwelling-place of the Spirit, start with II Corinthians 3:17: "Now the Lord
is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty."
- Where is there liberty in the Church of Rome? Her hallmark is not
liberty but bondage, not freedom but slavery. In fact, the
tremendous spiritual and physical power that Rome exerts over every aspect of
the lives of her adherents is the only means by which she can achieve her aims,
and her official statements clearly state it. The title of Adrian Pigott's book
says it all: Freedom's Foe - The Vatican [London: The Pioneer
Press], and he quotes the damning statement of Cardinal Segura of Seville, who
said in 1952: "From the unhindered liberty of thought, tuition and press,
there may arise many evils - the greatest evil of which is the freedom of
religion." The nineteenth-century British politician and historian Lord
Macaulay wrote of the Vatican system that "among the contrivances that have
been devised for deceiving and oppressing mankind, it occupies the highest
place" [quoted in Crowley: op.cit., p. 203]. 6. Mariolatry - the Religion of the Future? I want to conclude with a warning that the Church of Rome is
increasingly promoting and expanding her doctrine of Mariolatry, which is a sign
of the increasing apostasy of the present age. Hunt [op. cit., p. 444]
points out that, historically, the cult of Mary developed "gradually"
and "as the apostasy gathered momentum". Hence it is a sign of
apostasy. The Encyclopaedia Britannica [Vol. 15, p. 459] states that
during the first centuries of the Church there was no emphasis of Mary
whatsoever. Even the Catholic Encyclopaedia agrees that there is "no
ground for surprise if we do not meet with any clear trace of the cultus of the
Blessed Virgin in the first centuries" [quoted by Kathleen R. Hayes:
"All-Night Prayer Vigil becomes Devotion to Lady of the New Advent",
NRI Trumpet, October, 1993, pp. 6-14]. It was Pope Leo XIII (1878-1903) who outstripped all his
predecessors in the promotion of Mariolatry and was therefore fittingly styled
the "Pope of the Rosary". Time Magazine [Dec. 30, 1991, p. 62]
comments that "according to modern Popes" Mary is "Queen of the
Universe, Queen of Heaven, Seat of Wisdom [...]". Mary is also playing an important role in the Ecumenical
movement. Speaking of the present Pope, the Milwaukee Sentinel reported
on March 26, 1987: "Pope John Paul, in an encyclical Wednesday, said
veneration of the Virgin Mary could help promote unity with other Christians.
[...] The Pope said a study of Mary can help heal division among Christian
churches." The Ecumenical Society of the Blessed Virgin Mary in England has
published a booklet entitled An Ecumenical Future for Roman Catholic Theology
of Mary. Its adherents place most of their ecumenical hopes on the fact that
"Christians of the East have always honoured her in a special way" and
"it is not only eastern Christians who venerate Mary". Special mention
is made of the Church of England and Continental Lutheranism. During the present Pope's (John Paul II's) visit to Lithuania
in 1993 he called Mary "Mother of the Church", "Queen of the
Apostles" and the "dwelling place of the Trinity" -
blasphemy which is repeated in the most often recited prayer of the Roman
Church, the Rosary. This man, again according to Time Magazine [Dec. 30,
1991, p. 64], "made Mary's unifying power a centrepiece of his Papal
arsenal. He has visited countless Marian shrines during his globetrotting, and
invokes the Madonna's aid in nearly every discourse and prayer that he
delivers." This man's personal motto is: "Mary, I am all yours."
He dedicated the whole earth to Mary in 1984. He attributed the fall of
Communism in his native country of Poland to Mary's intervention, as well as the
collapse of the Soviet Union, and credited her with saving his life in the 1981
assassination attempt. He thus continues in the long line of Popes to ascribe
divine attributes to Mary, and has taken Marian devotion to new heights. Like his predecessor (John XXIII), who called Eastern Europe
"that other lung of our common European homeland", John Paul II is a
fanatical Europhile who yearns to rebuild the Holy Roman Empire of the Middle
Ages under the domination of the Church of Rome. He told the European Parliament
in 1988 of his wish that Europe might "one day expand to the dimensions
bestowed on it by geography and above all by history" (cunningly avoiding
the word "religion"). It is no accident that the symbol of Europe
today is a flag with twelve stars, not representing, as most people think, the
number of member States of the European Union, but taken from the Flag of Mary.
The full symbol of this emerging politico-religious colossus may be seen in a
stained-glass window of Strasbourg Cathedral, where Mary, beneath a halo of
twelve stars, is shown holding the 1,000-year-old symbol of political
unification - the crown of the Holy Roman Empire. The picture is
reproduced on the cover of Adrian Hilton's revealing book The Principality
and Power of Europe [Dorchester House, Rickmansworth, 1977]. This book is
vital reading, for it unmasks the Vatican's dream of re-establishing its
domination over Europe and the intrigue and deception behind it. Mary is being
transformed into the Goddess of Europe. The public mood in the United Kingdom following the death of
Princess Diana proved to be gravely susceptible to the Marian cult, and our
Romanist-dominated media well knew how to exploit the mass outpouring of public
grief for a wonderful woman who, like the Mary of the Bible, was nevertheless no
saint. Like the Diana of Roman mythology - the goddess of the moon and the
hunt, the guardian of springs and streams and the protector of wild animals, and
the Latin counterpart of the Greek goddess Artemis - our own Princess
Diana could become the pagan icon which the Vatican will use in its ploy to draw
our country spiritually from the truths and blessings of Reformation freedoms
and once more enchain this land that Rome calls "Mary's Dowry" in the
bondage of her evil and persecuting system.
http://www.ianpaisley.org |